User talk:Truth

Hi Truth, The protocol at SourceWatch is for substantive changes, such as the deletion of content, to be explained on the corresponding talk page. In the absence of that, changes are likely to be interpreted as vandalism and simply reverted. Now, maybe there is a good reason for your repeated unexplianed changes - but if there is post a brief statement outlining the case for them. If they are reasonable they will stand. If on the other hand you continue to make unexplained changes I can either protect the affected page and/or block you from making any further contributions to the database - though I would prefer not to have to go to that length. --Bob Burton 18:29, 24 December 2006 (EST)

Who is 'Truth'?
As somebody who has spent an extensive amount of time looking into the work of Lee Kaplan for the past six months, I've also had many encounters with his purported 'supporters' and 'staff members.' Thanks to logging software we installed on our websites (Lee Kaplan Watch) and cooperation from other bloggers, we were able to prove that Lee assumed a number of different aliases in order to 'defend' himself. Now, there is nothing wrong with being anonymous on the internet--but there is something oddly pathetic about pretending to be at least half a dozen different people so that you can make yourself sound appreciated. All this in mind and in addition to the knowledge that the alias 'Truth' has been used by Kaplan himself in the past, my conclusion is that in all likelihood, all of the vandalism that has occurred on this article has been rendered by Lee himself.

Please see the following links for additional information:

http://kaplanwatch.blogspot.com/2006/06/mr-kaplan-has-more-important-things-to.html

http://angrywhitekid.blogs.com/weblog/2006/02/the_nauseating_.html (comments by Truth)

SW Protocols
Hi again Truth,

1) I deleted the page you started on PASSIA. It was entirely unreferenced and as I have explained previously, the standard is that for material to be included it needs to be referenced. For further information please see http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=SourceWatch:References

2) Please don't delete material from the Talk page. If a problem - such as the dead links - has been fixed, just post a brief note to that effect. As for other posts, please leave them intact as they allow contributors to better understand the edit history of the page and why material has been added ot deleted. If there is a point you disagree with, freel free to post a response indenting your comments by adding : at the start of the line and adding your signature. --Bob Burton 16:35, 25 December 2006 (EST)

What Does It Take?
Hi again Truth, it seems that no matter what I write regarding reasonably straightforward protocols at SourceWatch that you prefer to ignore them. Rather than having myself or other contributors spending more time undoing your unexplained changes, I'm banning you from contributions for 72 hours. If you have queries about SourceWatch protocols you can either read the Help pages or drop me a email. --Bob Burton 04:06, 26 December 2006 (EST)