Talk:International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation & Political Violence

This website is a complete joke with people who hide behind stupid names like 'Artificial Intelligence' or 'Consumercal'. But then I'm not suprised if you have people like Sheldon Rampton behind this liberal-biased website. I think ActivistCash has understood very well what you are all about. You all appear to have watched to many episodes of the X-Files. Anyway, there are very powerful business intrests supporting the ICSR, so if you don't remove this page by Monday morning lawyers will be employed who by the evening of Monday will ensure that the CMD and SourceWatch no longer exist. The choice is yours.

Perhaps I did'nt make myself clear. The whole page needs to be removed or changed to the direct priorities of the ICSR. It does not need publicity on this type of wiki. Burton, you seem to be a very confused little man. 'Mike' is also not needed to add a profile on the people at the organization. Please stop

User Note
The above unsigned note was posted by User PR Newman. Below is a collation of the various notes the user has posted to different pages. --Bob Burton 06:43, 6 December 2007 (EST)

after this User PR Newman posted the following note to the user page of Artificial Intelligence:


 * Judging by your editing on the US Presidential elections, all your articles are very poorly referenced and I would appreciate it if you did not reduce the high standard of the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation & Political Violence by adding any of your diatribe. The ICSR is a very powerful organisation with the type of big business support, so the pathetic little comments of people on this gossip blog will just simply be ignored. As you are apparently a SourceWatch Editor, it's your job to remove and permanently delete all the pages about the ISCR that are on this website. I protest Strongly and demand that you take direct steps in an orderly and speedy manor or I shall be forced to take action.

As a result I blocked the user after posting the following note:


 * Directing unwarranted criticism at editors is as equally unwelcome at SourceWatch as vandalism of articles. You have not identified any specific inaccuracy with the ICSR article, yet have been implying legal consequences for anyone who doesn't do as you direct.--Bob Burton 23:35, 3 December 2007 (EST)

This was subsequently deleted by "Newman" from their user page.

After the block expired PR Newman posted the following note to my user talk page.


 * Steps have already been taken against SourceWatch. You will notice that SourceWatch's entry of the International Centre For The Study Of Radicalisation does not appear on Google anymore. It's been taken care of that the entry on Google of the ICSR and all its personnel will not appear on Google no matter how much you and all the others write about the organization. In fact do your worst. The reality is that no matter how much you write you won't be able to get the pages back on Google. Please note Mr. Burton I've not vandalized any page nor written any abuse. I look forward to hearing from you or any other editor ;) --PR Newman

It may intrest you fools that our conference was a great success and we have received a lot of pledges for financial support so your pathetic little website has had no impact whatsoever.