User talk:Freeeditor

Hi Freeeditor, I reverted your latest change to the headline re the SF Board of Supervisors. Nowhere in the supporting reference is there any mention of a "ban" on Savage. Instead it states that it "condemns" his comments. Please don't try to add material that is not supported by the available evidence. Please see http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=SourceWatch:References for further details on our referencing standards --Bob Burton 23:52, 4 September 2007 (EDT)

Hi, see http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Talk:Michael_Savage for an explanation on blocking. --Bob Burton 21:18, 5 September 2007 (EDT)


 * Hello, Freeeditor. It would seem that your only interest here at SW is Michael Savage. As Bob Burton replied nearly three weeks ago, there is no reason to eliminate Media Matters links nor to defer to a general link for them. Most SW visitors are looking for direct access to information and are, therefore, more likely to click on links provided for them. Additionally, a visitor may be interested in one topic link or a few topic links and not desire to have to browse on their own. The purpose of SW is to provide readily accessible information ... and it IS all SW visitors whom we aim to please. Artificial Intelligence 10:59, 24 September 2007 (EDT)