Talk:Daniel Pipes

I have reverted edits by 2007patriot to an earlier version by Sheldon Rampton. There was no basis for the edits and watered down Pipes' Zionism and dismissed criticisms from the left. --Judith Siers-Poisson 21:58, 5 February 2008 (EST)

The recent mass revision was basically for all purposes, a puff piece for Pipes, glossing over his more incediary remarks, as well as basically glossing over his various connections. As such I reverted the article back to PaulR's version. --SiberioS

I have also determined to revert the mass overhaul by 24.193.243.158. Seeing that SiberioS has already reverted, I'll add my reasons in support. Briefly and simply stated, at this stage of article development, individual edits of fact would be welcome. Deleting of content which is obviously partisan or extremely subjective is usually a good thing. Substitution with equally partisan content is not productive. Deletion of factual content is unacceptable. --Maynard 21:08, 4 Jan 2005 (EST)

Again, the material is exactly the same as before, and is again, another puff piece for Pipes. Some of the material COULD be included, though minus certain subjective statements and positions. The person whose doing the updates should DISCUSS what changes are wanted, and after a consensus is reached, they can be added.

SiberioS

His position at the "Peace Institute" wasn't renewed by Bush this year. Links?