Talk:Wahid Azal

Defamatory article inclusive of irrelevant material
This article has been created obviously by a member of the Internet Committee of the Haifan Bahai organization as a form of defamatory libel. It is uncategorized and it's inclusion is largely irrelevant for the purposes of SourceWatch. It's quoted material is completely tangential to the subject of the entry so it has been taken down. But the article for now should be left here as evidence to the Center for media and Democracy and other editors as evidence of propaganda and defamation perpetrated by members of this organization. Editors and administrators please watch this page together with the handle which has been editing it. --Wahid 23:22, 5 February 2009 (EST)

You are the subject of this article. I am new to the process and if have done something wrong in my ignorance, I am sorry. The fact remains, you regularly lie, particularly about the Baha'i religion. As such, you are a disseminator of disinformation and the purpose of this web site is to document people such as yourself, and your practices. Someone has removed an example I provided of you working to deceive the public. I can provide more examples. --User:Owen 5:40, 6 February 2009 (EST)

Indeed I am the subject of this article. As far as your accusations go, it is pretty evident that you are here as a propagandist of the Haifan Bahai Faith organization disseminating your own organizational disinformation and misinformation. Since such things are orchestrated by the Internet Committee of said organization, it would appear you are here on their behest. That stated, I stand by everything I have ever said about the Haifan Bahai Faith organization online and can prove everything I have said. If your organization feels it has been lied about, they could've sued me a long time ago, but have not. I have repeatedly offered them the opportunity to address all matters in a courtroom or before the court of public opinion, but they have shied away. Conversely I can also prove with meticulous documentation that your organization systematically lies, obfuscates and misdirects; has lied about its history and historiography; and regularly lies, misdirects, obfuscates and exagerrates about human rights violations in Iran, etc. Now the criteria of this site is indeed to stop funded disinformation. Since I am not being funded by any foundation, government or party, your reasons for including this article are purely for self-serving purposes of organizational propaganda and defamation. But even with that, I believe the article should stay.

Please also note that SourceWatch is not Wikipedia. Here you cannot bully, intimidate, misdirect and stampede by numbers into getting your way as you have over there. --Wahid 00:53, 7 February 2009 (EST)

Article
--Wahid 22:15, 7 February 2009 (EST)

It seems that this article was created here as a spillover of some editing dispute over at Wikipedia. As a result, I'm not really persuaded that this article should be in SourceWatch at all.--Bob Burton 15:35, 7 February 2009 (EST)

Hi Bob,

I totally agree. --Wahid 22:15, 7 February 2009 (EST)